Somatic hypermutation (SHM) occurs at what stage of B-cell development?
From: Clinical Immunology (Fifth Edition), 2019
Related terms:
- Memory B Cell
- Intravenous Immunoglobulin
- Activation-Induced Cytidine Deaminase
- T Cells
- Germinal Center
- Monospecific Antibody
- Mutation
Normal Lymphoid Organs and Tissues
Elaine S. Jaffe MD, in Hematopathology, 2017
Somatic Hypermutation.
Centroblasts undergo somatic hypermutation of the immunoglobulin V region genes, which alters the antigen affinity of the antibody produced by the cell.76,77 This process requires the activity of AID, which is induced in these cells. Somatic hypermutation results in marked intraclonal diversity of antibody-combining sites in a population of cells derived from only a few precursors. Studies of single centroblasts picked from the dark zone of germinal centers suggest that in the early stages, a germinal center may contain about 5 to 10 clones of centroblasts, which show only a moderate amount of immunoglobulin V region gene mutation; later, the number of clones diminishes to as few as three, and the degree of somatic mutation increases.57 This process introduces somatic mutations in other genes expressed in the germinal center, such asBCL6 andPAX5, although at a lower frequency than is seen in the immunoglobulin genes.78-80
Somatic Hypermutation
Alberto Martin, ... Matthew D. Scharff, in Molecular Biology of B Cells (Second Edition), 2015
1.1 Somatic Hypermutation
Somatic hypermutation is a process in which point mutations accumulate in the antibody V-regions of both the heavy and light chains, at rates that are about 106-fold higher than the background mutation rates observed in other genes (Figure 1). This accumulation of mutations at the V-region genes occurs at the centroblast stage of B-cell differentiation in the germinal centers of secondary lymphoid organs. Whereas the overall goal of this process is to produce high-affinity antibodies, in the absence of selection, SHM does not distinguish between favorable and unfavorable mutations and can produce antibodies with (1) higher affinity for antigen, (2) lower affinity for antigen, and (3) no change in affinity for antigen. Somatic hypermutation can also lead to nonfunctional antibodies, such as antibodies that cannot fold correctly, or antibody genes that harbor premature stop codons [2,3]. Whereas SHM of the antibody V-region does not always produce a higher-affinity antibody, the selection process for antigen binding that occurs in the light zone of the germinal center selects for B-cells that produce the highest-affinity antibodies. Mutations tend to accumulate in the complementarity determining regions (CDRs) of the antibody V genes. Because the CDRs are the locations that directly contact the antigen, it is not surprising that these regions would have the most mutations after selection. Evolutionary selection over millions of years has facilitated this process by enriching the CDRs for codons with activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) hot spots that result in replacement mutations, whereas the codon usage in the frameworks of V genes is more likely to lead to silent or conservative mutations [4–6].
FIGURE 1. Secondary antibody diversification processes.
(A) Somatic hypermutation: the antibody V-region accumulates point mutations at rates that are 1 million-fold higher than the background mutation rate to alter the specificity of the antibody. (B) Gene conversion: a diversification process that uses homologous recombination to introduce sequences from upstream ψV region sequences into the rearranged V region to change the antibody affinity. (C) Class switch recombination: a recombination process in which one downstream constant region (Cγ1 depicted) replaces an upstream constant region (Cμ depicted) through a double-stranded break intermediate.
Somatic mutations of the V-region have been observed to accumulate between about 100 base pairs and about 2kb downstream of the promoter of the rearranged V(D)J gene, with the peak of mutation accumulation occurring within the V(D)J exon [7–10]. However, although the rest of the genome is normally protected from AID-induced mutations, low levels of SHM have been observed at non-antibody genes [11–17], and indeed, mutations at some of these genes have been associated with B-cell malignancies. Because the overexpression of AID leads to malignancies in T-cells and other tissues, but not in B-cells [18,19], it appears that B-cells have evolved to tolerate high mutation rates without eliciting a commensurate DNA damage response, cell cycle arrest, or apoptosis; but how this is accomplished remains an open question. We will address a number of possible explanations during this chapter.
View chapterPurchase book
Read full chapter
URL:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123979339000205
Developmental Immunology and Role of Host Defenses in Fetal and Neonatal Susceptibility to Infection
Christopher B. Wilson MD, in Remington and Klein's Infectious Diseases of the Fetus and Newborn Infant, 2016
Somatic Hypermutation
Immunoglobulin variants are generated among germinal center B cells by the process of somatic hypermutation, in which immunoglobulin genes accumulate apparently random point mutations within productively rearranged V, D, and J segments.852 These variants undergo a selection process favoring B cells that bear sIg with high affinity for antigen. Such high-affinity immunoglobulin provides high levels of BCR signaling, favoring germinal center B-cell survival rather than a default pathway of apoptosis. Somatic hypermutation requires activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), which appears to be expressed only by germinal center B cells,853 and error-prone DNA polymerases.854 AID deaminates deoxycytidine residues in single-stranded DNA to deoxyuridines, which are processed by DNA replication, base excision, or mismatch repair to restore normal base pairing between the two DNA strands, resulting in somatic hypermutation. The effects of the mutator are focused on the variable region of immunoglobulin and its immediate flanking sequences. The peak of somatic mutation is approximately 10 to 12 days after immunization with a protein antigen. Somatic mutation is an important means for increasing antibody affinity, but it may also result in the acquisition of autoimmunity. Thus human B cells with newly acquired autoreactivity as a result of somatic mutation are not subject to receptor editing or other tolerance mechanisms.
Most neonatal and fetal immunoglobulin heavy chain gene variable regions appear not to have undergone somatic mutation,806,808 consistent with the predominance of antigenically-naïve new emigrant B cells in the fetus and neonate. By contrast, somatic mutations are detectable in some neonatal B cells expressing IgG or IgA transcripts,812 and the mutational frequency per length of DNA is similar to that of adult B cells. In contrast to follicular B cells, in which somatic hypermutation appears to occur only in germinal centers, a subset of IgM+IgD+CD27+ B cells found in cord blood and in the fetal spleen demonstrate somatic hypermutation before the general appearance of germinal centers.855 In this context, extrafollicular somatic hypermutation appears to serve as a means to broaden the preimmune immunoglobulin repertoire of this B-cell subset. This early competency for somatic hypermutation by fetal B cells is supported by the similar ability of cord blood and adult peripheral blood B cells to increase expression of AID and error-prone polymerases in response to BCR engagement.854
Base Excision Repair and Nucleotide Excision Repair
T. Izumi, I. Mellon, in Genome Stability, 2016
4.1 Diversity of Immune Cells by Activation-Induced Deaminase
Somatic hypermutation (SHM) and class switch recombination (CSR) are necessary for antibody diversification in antigen-specific memory B cells, and both mechanisms require activation-induced deaminase (AID) [164–166]. Because AID deaminates cytosine to generate uracil in DNA, a well-known BER substrate, involvement of BER in this pathway is being established [45,166]. The canonical BER reactions depicted in Fig. 17.1 do not likely occur during SHM and CSR. Instead, when uracil is generated in DNA by AID, it serves as a flag to recruit error-prone bypassing DNA polymerases for SHM and components of DNA DSB repair cooperate with some of the BER enzymes to lead to CSR [46,164]. Continued understanding of the mechanisms of SHM and CSR involving BER, other DNA-repair and -signaling pathways should illuminate the sophisticated crosstalk among the DNA-repair pathways.
View chapterPurchase book
Read full chapter
URL:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128033098000173
B-Cell Development and the Antibody Response
David Male BA, MA, PhD, in Immunology, 2021
Affinity maturation depends on somatic hypermutation and cell selection
The antibodies produced in a primary response to a TD antigen generally have a low average affinity. However, during the course of the response, the average affinity of the antibodies increases or matures. As antigen becomes limiting, the clones with the higher affinity will have a selective advantage. This process is calledaffinity maturation.
The degree of affinity maturation is inversely related to the dose of antigen administered. High antigen doses produce poor maturation compared with low antigen doses (Fig. 9.18). It is thought that:
- •
in the presence of low antigen concentrations, only B cells with high-affinity receptors bind sufficient antigen and are triggered to divide and to differentiate;
- •
in the presence of high antigen concentrations, there is sufficient antigen to bind and to trigger both high- and low-affinity B cells.
Although individual B cells do not usually change their overall specificity, the affinity of the antibody produced by a clone may be altered. Affinity maturation is achieved through the cellular events underlying B-cell development, described earlier: i.e. somatic hypermutation and antigen-driven selection and expansion of mutant clones expressing higher-affinity antibodies.
The mechanism by which affinity maturation occurs is thought to involve B-cell progeny binding to antigen held on FDCs in order to proliferate and to differentiate further. Unprocessed antigen in immune complexes is captured by the FDCs via their Fc and complement receptors and held there. As B cells encounter the antigen, there is competition for space on the surface of the FDC, leading to selection. When a B cell with higher affinity arises, it will stay there longer and be given a stronger signal. In addition, B cells with higher-affinity receptors will internalize more antigen and therefore they have a greater potential of presenting it to T cells and receiving T-cell help. Hence, B cells with higher-affinity antibodies have a selective survival advantage.
Molecular Mechanisms of Somatic Hypermutation and Class Switch Recombination
S.P. Methot, J.M. Di Noia, in Advances in Immunology, 2017
2 Molecular Mechanisms of SHM and CSR
2.1 Overview
SHM and CSR can be described as biochemical pathways in which one enzyme generates the substrate of the next (Fig. 1). Some species, like chickens, use a recombination-based mechanism named Ig gene conversion in addition to or instead of SHM to diversify the IgV (for a review, see Tang & Martin, 2007). These three processes are mechanistically related and are initiated by AID through the same enzymatic reaction: the deamination of DNA cytosine bases to convert them to uracils (Fig. 1). This activity was foreseen in the DNA deamination model for SHM and CSR (Petersen-Mahrt, Harris, & Neuberger, 2002; Poltoratsky, Goodman, & Scharff, 2000). The model, for which there is overwhelming evidence, posits that the AID-catalyzed uracils in the DNA are recognized by either the uracil-DNA glycosylase UNG or, as a U:G mispairing by the mismatch recognition heterodimer MutSα, made of the MSH2 and MSH6 enzymes. UNG and MutSα precede AID in evolution and normally initiate error-free uracil repair pathways that would reestablish the original cytosine. However, downstream from AID, UNG, and MutSα initiate uracil processing with various possible outcomes, many of which are mutagenic and underpin antibody gene diversification. Thus, the uracil in DNA can be replaced by other bases; or prompt further mutation in its vicinity that expands the spectrum of SHM to include mutations at A:T pairs, which AID cannot directly modify. Uracils can also be converted into DNA DSBs, which are necessary for CSR. Thus, the pathways of SHM and CSR become progressively more complex as they go downstream from AID, with multiple layers of regulation and competition between alternative pathways defining the levels of SHM and the efficiency of CSR. Accordingly, early factors in the cascade play more defining roles in Ig diversification and need to be more regulated, as dramatically exemplified by the multitude of pathways regulating AID activity. Competition between the canonical DNA repair roles and the subverted action of UNG and MutSα also shapes the antibody response. Here, we will review recent advances in this field using this general scheme as a framework (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1. Scheme of the major steps during antibody diversification in B cells. This scheme provides the framework for the review. B cells express AID after recognizing the antigen (Ag) through surface antibody acting as the B cell receptor (BCR), to initiate SHM and CSR of the antibody genes. AID is regulated at multiple levels in the cytoplasm and in the nucleus. In the nucleus, AID must home to the Ig loci via its association with the transcription machinery in order to access the DNA. AID deaminates cytosine bases (C) in the DNA to generate uracils (U). The U is recognized by either the UNG or the MutSα heterodimer, and subsequently processed in several possible ways. Final resolution of the lesion results in either faithful repair or antibody diversification via SHM or CSR.
2.2 Relevance for Humoral Immunity
AID deficiency leads to dramatic immunodeficiency, with the whole antibody repertoire restricted to unmutated IgM (Muramatsu et al., 2000; Revy et al., 2000). While AID cannot trigger CSR on its own, it is sufficient for a limited version of SHM. Uracil in DNA is indistinguishable from thymine for most DNA polymerases; hence, AID can directly produce transition mutations at C:G pairs (from C:G to T:A, Fig. 1) and thereby diversify the antibody genes, as shown by simultaneously removing Ung and MutSα (Shen, Tanaka, Bozek, Nicolae, & Storb, 2006; Xue, Rada, & Neuberger, 2006). The importance of SHM for gut homeostasis was demonstrated using a mouse model expressing an AID variant that allows normal levels of IgA in the gut but display severely reduced SHM (Wei et al., 2011). However, it is difficult to test whether the restricted pattern of SHM produced only by the AID footprint would be enough for adaptive immunity because these mice completely lack CSR. However, since even germline sequences are able to protect from certain infections, it is likely that even SHM restricted to transitions at C:G would be advantageous for the response against some infections. For instance, SHM is largely restricted to C:G pairs in some species, such as Xenopus (Wilson et al., 1992). On the other hand, normal levels of SHM with very low levels of CSR can be obtained in Ung−/− mice upon acute immunization or infection (Zahn et al., 2013). These mice are capable of affinity maturation of the IgM response but their ability to fight infections has not been tested. Nonetheless, the severely reduced kinetics of CSR in Ung−/− mice (Zahn et al., 2013) and the profound immunodeficiency of UNG-deficient patients (Imai et al., 2003) highlight the critical role of UNG and CSR in immune responses. Patients lacking MutSα or its downstream factor PMS2 display cancer predisposition but also reduced CSR, though their immunodeficiency is milder than in patients lacking AID or UNG (Péron et al., 2008; Whiteside et al., 2002).
View chapterPurchase book
Read full chapter
URL:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065277616300530
Activation of the Immune System
Ursula Storb, in Encyclopedia of Immunobiology, 2016
SHM Occurs Also in Non-Ig Genes (from Storb, 2014)
SHM is initiated by AID deaminating cytosine (C) to uracil (U). This first phase is followed by a second phase (Neuberger etal., 2003) of error-prone repair of the uracils by corrupting the DNArepair mechanisms that outside of the SHM process faithfully revert the U to C: base excision repair (BER) and mismatch repair (MMR) (Longerich etal., 2006). How exactly this shift to error-prone mechanisms occurs is notknown, but the errors are due to the engagement of error-prone DNA lesion bypass DNA polymerases, such as pol eta (Sale etal., 2009). However, the system is not entirely fail-safe. Non-Ig genes are also mutated as bystanders; for example, the BCL6 gene is mutated in normal human memory B cells (Shen etal., 1998), and later was found mutated in germinal center-derived B cell lymphomas (Pasqualucci etal., 2001).
A large-scale DNA sequencing analysis of non-Ig genes in Peyer's patch B cells showed that many genes were mutated in AID-producing B cells from mice double deficient in DNA MMRand BER(Liu etal., 2008). The authors concluded that B cells were protected from excess mutagenesis by employing a separate mechanism for error-free repair in non-Ig genes. However, an in-depth review of SHM showed that Ig genes, the major biological targets of SHM, are also undergoing a high rate of error-free repair of AID-induced uracils (Storb etal., 2009). Thus, apparently error-free repair of SHM-associated uracils is universal. It represents an additional protection against genome-wide mutagenesis in B cells that express AID. It is likely that in cells that are wild type (wt) for DNA repair genes, Ig genes acquire more mutations than non-Ig genes because they are highly expressed and contain at leasttwo enhancers that are bound by various trans-acting factors that efficiently attract AID and are required for SHM. It appears that most, if not all, the non-Ig targets contain similar sequence motifs as those present in the enhancers of Ig genes (Duke etal., 2013).
View chapterPurchase book
Read full chapter
URL:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123742797090123
Aberrant AID Expression by Pathogen Infection
Atsushi Takai, ... Tsutomu Chiba, in Molecular Biology of B Cells (Second Edition), 2015
2 Physiologic Role of Activation-Induced Cytidine Deaminase
SHM and CSR are unique genetic events specifically observed in B cells. SHM is defined as the introduction of nucleotide alterations at the V regions of heavy and light chain genes with a high frequency, thereby enabling the selection of B cells producing high-affinity antibodies [5–7]. In contrast, CSR exchanges the heavy chain constant domain (CH) for one of a set of downstream CH exons, allowing B cells to produce different antibody isotypes (IgG, IgA, or IgE) with distinct physiologic functions, but without changing antigen specificity [8,9]. Although these two events occur independently [10,11], they are similar in that they basically take place in the germinal center of antigen-stimulated B cells [12–14]. These B cell–specific genetic modification events are initiated by the same molecule, activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) [15,16]. AID is a member of the apolipoprotein B mRNA-editing enzyme catalytic polypeptide (APOBEC) family comprising nucleotide-editing enzymes that insert nucleotide alterations into target DNA or RNA sequences through cytidine deamination [17]. AID is expressed only at the germinal center of activated B cells under physiologic conditions [15,18]. No hypermutations or gene-switching events at the Ig loci are found in patients with congenital AID deficiency [16,19]. Furthermore, the fact that AID-deficient B cells fail to undergo SHM and CSR confirms that AID is essential for both of these events [16,20,21]. AID was first considered to be an RNA-editing enzyme that edits target mRNA sequences to initiate either SHM or CSR [15,16,22]. Recent studies, however, support a role of AID in the deamination of DNA sequences [23–34].
View chapterPurchase book
Read full chapter
URL:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123979339000217
Diversity, Generation of
Kathleen N. Potter, J.Donald Capra, in Encyclopedia of Immunology (Second Edition), 1998
Somatic mutation
Somatic hypermutation is a key mechanism in generating antibody diversity. The details of the mechanisms and regulation of somatic hypermutation are unknown. In the human, somatic hypermutation occurs in the presence of antigen, unlike in sheep where antigen-independent somatic hypermutation occurs. The germinal centers of peripheral lymphoid tissues are the sites where somatic hypermutation, positive selection and differentiation of B cells with high-affinity receptors occur. Germinal centers are the only places in the body where antigen is retained for months or years in an extracellular location. Antigen is trapped on the surface of follicular dendritic cells which hold it as an antigen–antibody complex in proximity to nearby B lymphocytes. It is in the microenvironment of the germinal center in which the repertoire of the antigen-specific B cell, influenced by signals from T cells, is shaped. Hypermutation is restricted to V regions and their flanking sequences of H and L chains (Figure 7). Since IgM antibodies undergo somatic mutation, H chain class switching is not required for somatic mutation to occur. Most antibodies expressed as germline sequences are of relatively low affinity. After contacting antigen, mechanisms which generate somatic mutations produce antibodies of higher affinity. There is enrichment of B cells with mutations which confer higher affinity for antigen, while B cells which have acquired stop codons or have lowered affinity are removed by apoptosis. Only rearranged, transcriptionally active Ig genes are mutated, at a rate of approximately 103 per bp per generation. Both productive and nonproductive rearrangements are substrates for mutation. There are several features characteristic of the hypermutation process: 1) mutations are mainly point mutations, with very rare deletions or insertions of mostly single nucleotides, 2) there is one strand of the double helix which is preferentially targeted, 3) foreign DNA in the context of an immunoglobulin transgene is somatically mutated, suggesting that the targeted sequence itself does not initiate the mutation process, 4) hotspots of mutation are observed at different positions in different sequences suggesting that the process is influenced by the primary DNA sequence, 5) the 5′ boundary of mutations is within the leader intron, and 6) while there is no defined 3′ end-point of the mutation tract, mutation does not extend into the C region. A current model indicates that transcription is necessary for mutation to occur.
Figure 7. Localization of mutations in the light chain locus. The 5′ boundary of mutations is within the leader intron, approximately 150bp after the transcription promoter (PRO), to approximately 1.5kb downstream but does not extend into the constant (C) region. (Reproduced with permission from Storb U (1996) The molecular basis of somatic hypermutation of immunoglobulin genes. Current Opinion in Immunology 8: 206–214.)
View chapterPurchase book
Read full chapter
URL:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0122267656002139
Molecular Mechanism of Class Switch Recombination
JANET STAVNEZER, ... TASUKU HONJO, in Molecular Biology of B Cells, 2004
COMPARISON OF CSR WITH SHM
CSR and SHM were previously thought to be mediated by different mechanisms, and the requirement of AID for both events surprised many scientists in the field. However, when we carefully compare the two events, they share several features that are critical to the molecular mechanisms of SHM and CSR. The targets of CSR and SHM must be transcribed before the reaction takes place. The efficiency of these genetic alterations is correlated with the level of transcription. The targets of both events do not have specific primary sequences, yet defined DNA regions are altered. Not only SHM but also CSR is associated with mutations. Most important, they both require AID activity.
CSR has important features mechanistically distinct from SHM. Not only do the products of CSR and SHM differ but also the initiation of the two events is dissimilar. CSR requires two DSBs, one each in two different S regions. By contrast, SHM is more likely to be initiated by a single nick on one strand of the target DNA (Faili et al., 2002b). During CSR, two separate DNA ends, which originally can be located 100 kb apart, have to be held in a close proximity. Without proteins that can hold the two recombining ends close together, it is probably impossible to join the DNA ends. It is therefore reasonable to assume that CSR depends on a protein complex that differs from a SHM complex. The CSR complex, which we refer to as “recombinasome,” may contain AID or the putative protein encoded by the mRNA it edits, MMR proteins, base excision repair enzymes, error-prone DNA polymerases, and NHEJ proteins. Although SHM may not require a complex of proteins involved in DNA synapsis, the “mutasome” may contain the DNA nicking enzyme, MMR, base excision repair enzymes, and error-prone DNA polymerases. Additional components in these complexes may be required to target them to the correct DNA segments.
During evolution, SHM appeared first in cartilaginous and bony fish, whereas these fish do not appear to have CSR (Litman et al., 1999; Flajnik, 2002). Amphibians, which evolved later, were the first to carry out both CSR and SHM. Another indication of the distinct functions of AID for CSR and SHM is found in hyper-IgM type II patients with mutations in AID who have significant levels of SHM, but almost no CSR (Revy et al., 2000). The results can be explained most easily by the possibility that AID interacts with different protein molecules when inducing SHM and CSR. Perhaps, in these patients, proteins required for CSR are unable to associate with the mutated AID, whereas proteins required for SHM interact normally. In addition, CSR and SHM are independently regulated. For example, LPS stimulation of splenic B cells efficiently induces CSR but very rarely SHM. Thus, although a single protein, AID, mediates both CSR and SHM, the two processes evolved stepwise and are regulated differently, although it is possible that in germinal center cells they occur concurrently. Altogether, the data suggest that CSR and SHM are likely to have different molecular mechanisms downstream of AID.
View chapterPurchase book
Read full chapter
URL:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780120536412500216